Going back to my last blog post, I
chose to explore the theme of portraiture of European elites with African
slaves. Within this theme, I directed some attention to the topic of trade
because these portraits it included slaves and luxuries that were exchanged
between Europe and Africa mainly between the 16th and 18th
centuries. The portraiture I focus on is the Portrait of the Duchess of Portsmouth made in 1682 by Pierre Mignard. In this image, we see the
Duchess posing along side a young African slave holding a coral filled with
pearls.
Louise de Kéroualle was the Duchess of Portsmouth. She first went to England in
1670 as the maid of honor for Charles II’s sister and ended up as the King’s
mistress in 1671. Louise was named Duchess in 1673 and bore Charles II a son
(NPG). In the Duchess’ portraiture, we can see that she is covered in very fine
clothing, which represents her higher-class status. Presenting the slave next
to her was just meant to be a sign of status, indicating the wealth she had
access to. Apart from claiming wealth, the young African American slave
provides a sense of contrast to make the Duchess’ white skin stand out (NPG).
The name of the slave is unknown, which further emphasizes their relatively low
importance participating in these portraits (NPG); their only function was to
indicate wealth.
The coral and the slave represent the trade between Europe and Africa. The
Transatlantic trade was extremely praised during this time (USI). European
countries continually fought to have a share in this growing intercontinental
trade. Slaves were one of the most admired luxuries in Europe and around the
world. Europeans traveled to Africa to acquire slaves along with other goods.
On the other hand, Wealthy African individuals were interested in the products
made in Europe, although most of the products imported from Europe were already
produced or available (in the case of materials) in Africa (Alpern 5). European
products presented status and prestige. Europeans would trade goods and materials
to obtain slaves from Africa, among these goods were rare corals.
In this portrait we can see the two
“goods” being exchanged; the coral and an African American slave. It’s
interesting and somewhat shocking to see that these two are included in the
same painting. Furthermore, the slave is holding one of the goods that was used
to “acquire” her. The young girl’s expression is of admiration and happiness.
The portrait seems to be very beautiful and shows the wealth and importance of
the Duchess. But was this morally correct? Did the young girl know why she was
being used in the portrait? Did she know the significance of the object she was
holding?
Sources
Alpern, Stanley B. What Africans Got for Their Slaves:
A Master List of European Trade Goods. S.l.: S.n., 1995. Print.
"Louise-Renee De Keroualle, Duchess of Portsmouth |
Biography - French Noble." Encyclopedia Britannica Online.
Encyclopedia Britannica, 21 Apr. 2013. Web. 19 Mar. 2015.
"Louise De Kéroualle, Duchess of Portsmouth." National
Portrait Gallery. National Portrait Gallery, n.d. Web. 19 Mar. 2015.
"Trade and Commerce." Trade and Commerce.
Understanding Slavery Initiative, n.d. Web. 19 Mar. 2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment